Originally titled "The Problem with Holidays", I thought it would be good to make it fit with the theme I've got going. I'll get right to it.
Individuals should not be blindly pressured to conform to social mores associated with a specific date.
While holidays act as an efficient medium for getting large portions of
a community to perform certain actions (or to celebrate in certain
ways), they should not dictate human behavior in a private setting –
specifically the home. Holidays are best used as a means to organize and
control large social events, not individual customs.
When
holidays are celebrated in the home in a traditional manner, there
exists a barrier to dynamic behavior. Actions become predictable and
lose meaning, not to mention we become bombarded by expectations.
Flexibility is sucked out of consciousness when we are forced to act a
certain way, all because of a social construct. When we act a specific
way year after year, the significance of the action becomes more
dependent on the fact that it is tradition, and not on the real results
of the action. It is a case of the means being valued more than the
ends.
Essentially, the goal changes to following a set behavior pattern
because tradition brings comfort. Why is this so?
People value
tradition because it is perceived as an efficient means of attaining
something, even if that something is as subjective as personal comfort.
It is a created stereotype of self-action, but need not be created by
the self. Tradition evolves out of our need to stick with what we are
used to. It is our desire for safety and our fear of the unknown. It is
the desire to adopt what works and the illusion of resourcefulness.
Regarding
Christmas, I could not understand the emphasis on presents (though in childhood I didn't care). It became
an expectation long before I was born. It is ingrained in my psyche and it
is deemed normal, but why? A great emphasis on giving is made to the
modern consumer, but should we not be willing to give each day of the
year? It has become a form of forced altruism. You must do something
good for others, or there will be punishment. It just turns out that the
punishment is social in nature. It ruins your reputation, and can
facilitate one’s judgment of others. Here is the grand test my friends!
What do you think of a man that gives nothing during the holidays? If
you are compelled to judge him or think badly of him because he did not
give at a certain time of the year, then there is something about this
giving that is more sinister.
One should not feel different
about a person’s action based solely on the date and time. If your opinion
about someone changes over a holiday, you are creating expectations for
others, which is a burden on them and yourself. You are adding restrictions to the kind of behavior that is
allowed, based solely on a societal construct. This means society has
warped your senses and altered your judgment. This leads me to my next
two theses.
Services are more
important than material goods when one is not in material need. When
dealing with human desires, the level of appreciation
for goods and/or services is inversely proportional to the person’s
expectations. How do people usually help others or show love? It
is through service and the use of time as the primary resource. Even
when things are made for others, love is shown through the dedication
and use of time to create the said thing. Buying goods is technically a
use of time, as time is needed to make money and purchase the gift, but this is usually an indirect
association. Less labor may go into purchasing gifts than the everyday
errands and favors we do for others.
In many cases, gifts are
unnecessary, but it is likely that services performed for others are
completely necessary. Thus, services generally fulfill a certain need
and are much appreciated. These hold a great value because they are
dynamic. They belong to the present moment and fulfill current needs.
But what about Christmas presents? People know they will be buying gifts
year after year. It is expected of them, and these gifts lose value. This loss of value is then compensated for by increasing the number of gifts or the financial cost of said gifts.
But more joy comes from the unexpected spontaneous acts of love, and consumers are
flooded with expectations which damper the experience. A gift from out of
the blue means more because you know for a fact that the person thought
of you on their own. They did not need the help of a marked date.
Now
imagine how one would value a service, such as the husband doing the
dishes, if there were a day dedicated to this year after year. No longer
would it be a favor, but a requirement. Not performing that service on
that day would be worse than any other day, but an outsider could see
the foolishness in such a concept. The same can be applied to gifts
given during any particular holiday. If it is not a surprise, it does
not excite the individual, and this impacts gratitude.
No comments:
Post a Comment